January 13, 2009

Berg v. Obama Denied Certiorari

By Julian Dunraven, J.D., M.P.A..

(For earlier posts on this case click here.)

Honorable Friends:

The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to hear Berg v. Obama. Despite this denial, there is still a chance it may be heard by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, where it is still pending. Berg reports that his brief is due by 20 January 2009. Ironically, that is inauguration day. Though it saddens me to say so, as this case will not even be heard, much less resolved, by the time Obama is sworn into office, I cannot imagine any court would presume to review the qualifications of a sitting president. Thus, I do not expect that there will be any further developments in this case. As such, the question of Obama’s constitutional qualifications falls to the U.S. Senate. The Senate has accepted Obama as fully qualified for office, and he will thus become the next President of the United States on January 20th.

Labels: , , , , ,

|

October 24, 2008

Could Obama Be Disqualified From The Election? The Federal Courts Will Decide

By Julian Dunraven, J.D., M.P.A.

(For updated information on the Motion to Dismiss, click here)

Honorable Friends,

For those of you unaware, Pennsylvania attorney Philip J. Berg has filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania alleging that Barack Obama is not eligible for the Office of the President because Obama lost his U.S. citizenship when his mother married an Indonesian citizen and naturalized in Indonesia. Berg further alleges that Obama followed her naturalization and failed to take an oath of allegiance when he turned 18 years old to regain his U.S. citizenship status. The case is Berg v. Obama.

It sounds crazy, I know. It becomes even stranger when you realize that Berg is a lifelong Democrat, the former Democratic Chairman of Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, an 8-year member of the state democratic committee, and former Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania. This is not a simple crank, and after reviewing the court documents, I believe the case is fairly strong, and has amazing implications.

It revolves around Article II Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution which provides in pertinent part that:

“No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States.”

To better understand the case, I recommend reading the complaint, Obama’s Motion to Dismiss, Berg’s Response in Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss, and Berg’s Motion for Summary Judgment. You can also read news about the case or donate to the cause by visiting Berg’s webpage.

Of course, the case is still developing and it is doubtful there will be any resolution before the election. If Obama loses the election, the case may be deemed moot and dismissed. If he wins, however, and Berg turns out to be correct, it would mean that we not only elected a man unqualified to hold office under the Constitution – we would have elected an illegal immigrant, who would then be disqualified from serving.

You might be wondering how our officials could have missed something so major. It is easy to do though if you think about it. Obama’s mother certainly used to be an American citizen. When he returned to the U.S. from Indonesia, how many government officials would even think to ask, “While away, did you or your parents happen to renounce your U.S. Citizenship?” It simply would not happen. Our officials would have proceeded as if Obama was a child of a U.S. Citizen. No one would know the truth unless he or his mother willingly revealed the information, or unless they were specifically examining Obama’s background in great detail.

I cannot even imagine the pressure this judge must be feeling, along with the Justices of the Supreme Court who will ultimately hear the appeal. Can you begin to hear the enraged screams of the rioters? Our courthouses will have to turn themselves into fortresses.

El Presidente and I will certainly be keeping a close watch on this fascinating case and provide updates as it develops. For now, however, I will leave you with the most interesting part of Berg’s argument thus far, taken from his Response in Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss and appended below.

* * * * * * * * * *


Even if Obama was, in fact, born in Hawaii, he lost his U.S. citizenship when his mother re-married and moved to Indonesia with her Indonesian husband. In or about 1966, when Obama was approximately five (5) years old, his mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, married Lolo Soetoro, a citizen of Indonesia, whom she had met at the Hawaii University, and moved to Indonesia with Obama. Obama lost his U.S. citizenship, when his mother married Lolo Soetoro, and took up residency in Indonesia. Loss of citizenship, in these circumstances, under U.S. law (as in effect in 1967) required that foreign citizenship be achieved through “application.” Such type of naturalization occurred, for example, when a person acquired a foreign nationality by marriage to a national of that country. Nationality Act of 1940, Section 317(b). A minor child follows the naturalization and citizenship status of their custodial parent. A further issue is presented that Obama’s Indonesian stepfather, Lolo Soetoro, either signed an acknowledgement acknowledging Obama as his son or Lolo Soetoro adopted Obama, giving Obama natural Indonesia citizenship which explains the name Barry Soetoro and his citizenship listed as Indonesian.

Obama admits in his book, “Dreams from my father” Obama’s memoir (autobiography), that after his mother and Lolo Soetoro were married, Lolo Soetoro left Hawaii rather suddenly and
Obama and his mother spent months in preparation for their move to Indonesia. Obama admits when he arrived in Indonesia he had already been enrolled in an Indonesia school and his relatives were waiting to meet him and his mother. Lolo Soetoro, an Indonesian State citizen, could not have enrolled Obama in school unless Lolo Soetoro signed an acknowledgement acknowledging Obama as his son, which had to be filed with the Government. Under Indonesian law, when a male acknowledges a child as his son, it deems the son, in this case Obama, as an Indonesian State citizen. Constitution of Republic of Indonesia, Law No. 62 of 1958 Law No. 12 of 2006 dated 1 Aug. 2006 concerning Citizenship of Republic of Indonesia, Law No. 9 of 1992 dated 31 Mar. 1992 concerning Immigration Affairs and Indonesian Civil Code (Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Perdata) (KUHPer) (Burgerlijk Wetboek voor Indonesie) states in pertinent part, State citizens of Indonesia include: (viii) children who are born outside of legal marriage from foreign State citizen mother who are acknowledged by father who is Indonesian State citizen as his children and that acknowledgment is made prior to children reaching 18 years of age or prior to marriage; Republic of Indonesia Constitution 1945, As amended by the First Amendment of 1999, the Second Amendment of 2000, the Third Amendment of 2001 and the Fourth Amendment of 2002, Chapter X, Citizens and Residents, Article 26 states, “(1) Citizens shall consist of indigenous Indonesian peoples and persons of foreign origin who have been legalized [sic] as citizens in accordance with law. (2) Residents shall consist of Indonesiancitizens and foreign nationals living in Indonesia.”

Furthermore, under the Indonesian adoption law, once adopted by an Indonesian citizen, the adoption severs the child’s relationship to the birth parents, and the adopted child is given the same status as a natural child, Indonesian Constitution, Article 2.

The laws in Indonesia at the time of Obama’s arrival did not allow dual citizenship. If an Indonesian citizen married a foreigner, as in this case, Obama’s mother was required to renounce her U.S. citizenship and was sponsored by her Indonesian spouse. The public schools did not allow foreign students, only citizens were allowed to attend as Indonesia was under strict rule and decreed a number of restrictions; therefore, in order for Obama to have attended school in Jakarta, which he did, he had to be a citizen of Indonesia, as the citizenship status of enrolled students was verified with Government records.

Obama was enrolled by his parents in a public school, Fransiskus Assisi School in Jakarta, Indonesia. Plaintiff has received copies of the school registration, attached as EXHIBIT “4”, in which it clearly states Obama’s name as “Barry Soetoro,” and lists his citizenship as Indonesian. Obama’s father is listed as Lolo Soetoro, Obama’s date of birth and place of birth are listed as August 4, 1961 in Hawaii, and Obama’s Religion is listed as Islam. This document was verified by television show Inside Edition, whose reporter, Matt Meagher, took the actual footage of the school record. At the time Obama was registered the public schools obtained and verified the citizenship status and name of the student through the Indonesian Government. All Indonesian students were required to carry government identity cards, or Karty Tanda Pendudaks, as well as family card identification called a Kartu Keluarga. The Kartu Keluarga is a family card which bears the legal names of all family members.

Since Obama’s birth was legally acknowledged by Lolo Soetoro, an Indonesian citizen, and/or Obama was adopted by Lolo Soetoro, which the evidence attached hereto supports, Obama became an Indonesian citizen and bears the status as an Indonesia natural child (natural-born). For this reason, Obama would have been required to file applications with the U. S. State Department and follow the legal procedures to become a naturalized citizen in the United States, when he returned from Indonesia. If Obama and/or his family failed to follow these procedures, then Obama is an illegal alien.

Regardless of whether Obama was officially adopted, (which required a Court process), by his Indonesian stepfather, Lolo Soetoro, or his birth was acknowledged (which only required the signing of a birth acknowledgement form), by Lolo Soetoro, one of which had to occur in order for Obama to have the name Barry Soetoro and his citizenship status listed as “Indonesian”, in either and/or both cases Obama’s name was required to be changed to the Indonesian father’s name, and Obama became a natural citizen of Indonesia. This is proven by the school records in Jakarta, Indonesia showing Obama’s name as Barry Soetoro and his citizenship as Indonesian. Again, the registration of a child in the public schools in Jakarta, Indonesia was verified with the Government Records on file with the Governmental Agencies.

The Indonesian citizenship law was designed to prevent apatride (stateless) or bipatride (dual citizenship). Indonesian regulations recognize neither apatride nor bipatride citizenship. In addition, since Indonesia did not allow dual citizenship neither did the United States, Hague Convention of 1930.

In or about 1971, Obama’s mother sent Obama back to Hawaii. Obama was ten(10) years of age upon his return to Hawaii.

As a result of Obama’s Indonesia “natural” citizenship status, there is absolutely no way Obama could have ever regained U.S. “natural born” status, if he in fact ever held such. Obama could have only become naturalized if the proper paperwork was filed with the U.S. State Department, in which case, Obama would have received a Certification of Citizenship.

Plaintiff is informed, believes and thereon alleges Obama was never Naturalized in the United States after his return. Obama was ten (10) years old when he returned to Hawaii to live with his grandparents. Obama’s mother did not return with him, and therefore, unable to apply for citizenship of Obama in the United States. If citizenship of Obama had ever been applied for, Obama would have a Certification of Citizenship.

Furthermore, Obama traveled to Indonesia, Pakistan and Southern India in 1981. The relations between Pakistan and India were extremely tense and Pakistan was in turmoil and under martial law. The country was filled with Afghan refugees; and Pakistan's Islamist-leaning Interservices Intelligence Agency (ISI) had begun to provide arms to the Afghan mujahideen and to assist the process of recruiting radicalized Muslim men--jihadists--from around the world to fight against the Soviet Union. Pakistan was so dangerous that it was on the State Department's travel ban list for US Citizens. Non-Muslim visitors were not welcome unless sponsored by their embassy for official business. A Muslim citizen of Indonesia traveling on an Indonesian passport would have success entering Indonesia, Pakistan and India. Therefore, it is believed Obama traveled on his Indonesian passport entering the Countries. Indonesian passports require renewal every five (5) years. At the time of Obama’s travels to Indonesia, Pakistan and India, Obama was twenty (20) years old. If Obama would have been a U.S. citizen, which he was not, 8 USC §1481(a)(2) provides loss of nationality by native born citizens upon "taking an oath or making an affirmation or other formal declaration of allegiance to a foreign state...after having attained the age of eighteen years”, in violation of 8 U.S.C. §1401(a)(1) Since Lolo Soetoro legally acknowledged Obama as his son and/or adopted Obama, Obama was a “natural” citizen of Indonesia, as proven by Obama’s school record attached as Exhibit “4”.

Labels: , , , ,

|

August 12, 2008

Colorado Primary Night Roundup

Ben has a roundup of results, as does Rocky Mountain Right, who's tracking election night results.

First, a hearty congratulations to fellow RMA blogger and friend Joshua Sharf, who was successful in his primary campaign. On to November!

Reflections on the other larger races (CD-6, CD-5, CD-2):
CD-6: So, how long will it take before soon-to-be ex-Secretary of State Mike Coffman to announce his candidacy for the 2010 Senate matchup against Ken Salazar? Just sayin'. Seriously, Coffman's election in CD-6 in November should provide the platform for a run at higher office no earlier than 2014, for an open Governorship (a re-elected Bill Ritter would be term-limited) or for Senate against Mark Udall (should Bob Schaffer lose). A run in 2010 will strain credulity, and prompt the question, is Coffman running for office to represent the people, or to represent Mike Coffman? Coffman should plan on holding the seat for at least 3 terms before remotely contemplating moving any higher up the political ladder in Colorado.

CD-5: Two way primaries provide a necessary level of competition for any party. Three-way (and higher) primaries simply favor the incumbent, and Doug Lamborn certainly benefited from a split opposition. Too bad for Jeff Crank, who would have likely been a much better long-term occupant in CD-5.

CD-2: Ditto on the three-way primary, except in this case, it helped to benefit the candidate--Jared Polis--with the deepest pockets. So now one of the "Gang of Four" has purchased a seat in the House. So that's how Democrats take the money out of politics! Oh wait, nevermind . . .

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

|

July 08, 2008

Denver's Early Voting Sites For August Primary Released

Here.

Labels: , ,

|

June 17, 2008

PoliticsWest Webcast: GOP Woes

Missed this last week--a good general conversation on the GOP electoral woes, changes in the electorate, voter trends, libertarians vs. social conservatives, etc.:



Colorado GOP chairman Dick Wadhams, Eric Sondermann, an independent political analyst and founder of Denver's SE2 consulting firm, David Harsanyi, a Denver Post columnist and author of the recent book "Nanny State," and Jessica Peck Corry, a public policy analyst for the Independence Institute and a blogger for PoliticsWest--moderated by the Denver Post's Chuck Plunkett.

Labels: , , , , ,

|

November 13, 2007

Around The Colorado Blogosphere 111307

For the most comprehensive coverage of the 2008 Senate race between Republican Bob Schaffer and Democrat Mark Udall--

For in-depth analysis and updates on "bag man" Bill Ritter's executive order on unions, visit Ben DeGrow.

Best Destiny has some more thoughts on Veterans' Day
:
So on this day in which cities and banks celebrate our Veterans, please take a moment to think not just of the 3800 who have died in Iraq, and all of those from WWII and Vietnam who we tend to think about so easily, but take a moment to consider the lesser-known heroes who have done some amazing hard work around the world that never get memorialized properly.

And thank all of them for their service.

If Denver can't get a small mail-in election in 2007 counted on time, what will happen next year when the Presidential election could once again hinge on a few dozen electoral votes, and the eyes of the nation have to wait for Denver's bumbling election officials to call on the SWAT team once again to count ballots?

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

|

November 07, 2007

Denver Election 2007 Results



Get out your checkbooks!

Looks like all of the ballot measures--1A-1I--will pass, as will Question 100, on making marijuana the city's lowest law-enforcement priority.

Labels: , ,

|

August 25, 2007

Official Countdown To 2008 Democratic National Convention

A long list of to do's for the Democrats by next August 25.

Denver Mayor John Hickenlooper, Governor Bill Ritter, and DNC Chair Howard Dean kicked things off Wednesday with a little speechification and a rally at the Pepsi Center.

Labels: , , , ,

|

August 01, 2007

Quiet '07 Ballot A Prelude To Busy '08

No statewide initiatives or referenda this year, for the first time since 1912.

Call it the calm before the '08 storm.

For Colorado, a hotly contested Presidential election combined with a Senatorial race touted to be the #1 most watched in the nation, along with several of the usual "election year" type of base-rallying initiatives and referenda designed to draw out the impassioned--not to mention the hosting of the Democrat National Convention--2008 should produce record turnouts. "Independents" and "unaffiliateds" will once again determine the balance of power at the national and state level, and the GOP should look to more alternative methods (hint: new media) to get out their message.

Successful get-out-the-vote campaigns in '00, '02, and '04 failed to bring in the last-minute rally that was hoped would bail out flailing GOP candidates in '06. Registered Republicans, allied conservatives, and right-leaning independents never showed up--contributing not only to Democrat victories, but to an "undervote" in Republican representation. The GOP should not expect '08 to be any different, hoping that the GOTV effort will deliver the Presidency and help to retain a valuable Senate seat. Only a rebuilt and reunited party effort committed to conservative principles will give the Colorado GOP a chance at being competitive or successful, given a potentially continued hostile electoral environment. Anything less and Republicans will be looking at additional lost seats (especially important in the state legislature) and consignment to the backwater of state politics for elections to come.

Labels: , , , ,

|

July 13, 2007

Schaffer’s Fundraising Figures “Inconvenient Truth” For Left

I'm stealing Ben's title, 'cuz I couldn't have said it better myself.

He deconstructs Jason Bane's ColoradoPols entries characterizing Bob Schaffer's fundraising numbers ($717,000) as disappointing in relation to Mark Udall's Q2 $1.1 million.

Read the rest of the analysis.

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

|

July 05, 2007

Hillary, Bill Clinton In Colorado

Today's funny lede:
Sen. Hillary Clinton and former President Clinton will be in Aspen this weekend, although for different reasons.
Ya think?

Labels: , , , , , ,

|

June 26, 2007

Blog Sweep 6-26-07

Ben DeGrow--GOP: Tempering Confidence with Patience in '08 and '10

The Drunkablog--Paul Campos considers blogging, trashes Ann Althouse

XDA--Drawing a Moral Line over Stem Cells

PPH--On Not Being GOP Cheerleaders--as we say here, "Supporting party above principle does a disservice to both"

Colorado Confidential--Journalists are mostly liberal[!], but the critics' bias is worse, and besides, journalists are more informed (conservatives are stupid and uninformed) and simply moved by the stories they cover

And if you care, there will be an impeachment rally Wednesday in Denver

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

|

April 30, 2007

Denver Mayor John Hickenlooper Cruises To Reelection

Denver's snoozer of municipal election will culminate with Mayor John Hickenlooper's coronation reelection. From CBS4's gratuitous hagiography:
Denver Mayor John Hickenlooper isn't facing much opposition as he runs for a second term in office.

Only one person stepped forward to challenge Hickenlooper. Danny Lopez, a city employee, doesn't think any politician should run without opposition. Former Mayors Wellington Webb and Federico Pena both faced aggressive challengers in their second term elections.
Denver, despite the non-partisan election rule, has become a de facto one-party state, like many other urban areas. Contested elections only arise from a competitive Democrat field. Republicans are few and far between.
This city election hasn't been getting much attention. Part of the thinking is that people in general are much more absorbed with national issues, especially the war in Iraq, but it is also because even his detractors believe Hickenlooper is simply unbeatable.

"In the last the months, my wife was looking at me and said, 'If you have such an easy election, how come you're working so hard?'" Hickenlooper said.

It is remarkable there has been no serious campaign against him. Even he is surprised at his enduring popularity.

"I never thought about it. As kind of a skinny geek in school, I worked pretty hard to figure out how to make people like me," Hickenlooper said. "I learned how to tell a joke from my older brother."
Perhaps we should forgo formalities like elections and just proclaim Hickenlooper Mayor-for-life.
Former Denver City Councilwoman Susan Barnes-Geldt said the mayor's quick wit and quirky charm has allowed him to survive issues that could easily have taken others down.

"He is by magnitude the best retail politician the city maybe has ever seen, people love him," Barnes-Geldt said. "You know, he got a remarkable free ride from just a lousy snow removal. Even worse, the elections in November, and people seem to be willing to shrug their shoulders, which is remarkable."

Hickenlooper said if he is reelected, his second term will be all about following through on ambitious initiatives.

"Whether you're talking about homelessness or economic development, whether you're talking about 311 or reforming the city's structure, whether you're looking at mass transit, trying to get mass transit back on track," Hickenlooper said.
Hickenlooper managed to retain his teflon reputation--though during the depth of Denver's post-blizzard digout, Hickenlooper's facade showed a few cracks, and his characteristic wit disappeared behind excuses, platitudes, and tentativeness. Illegal immigration does not appear to be a city priority, what with Denver's virtual sanctuary status enshrined by activists in all levels of the city government.
"Did we really create 50,000 jobs?" Barnes-Geldt asked. "Is the city really a better place to work for city employees? Is the city safer?"

Barnes-Geldt concedes she's probably a much tougher critic than the average voter, especially this year in a ho-hum election -- one where even Hickenlooper's opponent said he's only running so the mayor doesn't win unopposed.

"I appreciate him going out and taking his time and trying to create a dialogue about what the future of this city looks like," Hickenlooper said of Lopez.

The biggest complaint heard about Hickenlooper is that he's never seen a tax increase he didn't like, but if that's true, that also has not hurt him yet.
That's true of all Democrats, not just Hickenlooper.
This is also a non-partisan election. Even though he's a democrat, there's no name republican to run against him. The joke around town is that they are only a handful of republicans in Denver anyhow.

Hickenlooper knows he needs to do more in the city's struggling neighborhoods to raise Denver up. There needs to be more amenities for the communities who really need more recreation centers and help with gang violence and those problems.

Hickenlooper also has a massive new justice center project to oversee and he's lost members of his cabinet. He needs a new city attorney and economic development director.

Denver's election is being conducted entirely by mail, so there shouldn't be a repeat of problems seen in November's elections. Then, voters waited in long lines at new voting centers after computers that were supposed to verify voter eligibility stalled.
Only a "handful" of Republicans around Denver? Try 70000. Imagine if they disparaged, oh I don't know, one of the permanently aggrieved groups with such marginalizing wording. But Republicans? There aren't enough to be worried about. And fighting gangs with more "amenities", eschewing law enforcement, and other "feel good" Hickenlooper initiatives can't go wrong, can it?

Mayor Hickenlooper, just like the election, simply mailed in his performance the last few years realizing he would cruise to reelection without a credible high-profile opponent. Of course, being a Democrat--or a "democrat"--in Denver can't hurt

Labels: , , ,

|

April 16, 2007

Allard Endorses Romney; Giuliani In Town For Fundraiser

Sen. Wayne Allard's endorsement of Presidential hopeful Mitt Romney had my head spinning:
Colorado Republican Sen. Wayne Allard is endorsing former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney for president, the campaign announced Monday.

Allard praised the candidate as someone who could bring “a much needed breath of fresh air to Washington.” He is the fifth GOP senator to publicly back Romney.

“After reviewing Governor Romney’s impressive resume and having the opportunity to visit one-on-one with him about his vision of innovation and change for America, I am proud to announce my endorsement of him,” Allard said in a statement.

Romney noted the Colorado Republican’s commitment to fiscal conservatism and homeland security.

“Senator Allard’s record of leadership and commitment to change make him a valuable addition to my campaign team,” Romney stated. “In Congress, he has fought to restrain spending while working to ensure that Americans are safe at home and abroad. Senator Allard understands, as I do, that we must bring innovation and transformation to Washington if we are to meet the new generation of challenges facing our country today.”
Colorado Conservative Project sums it up nicely: Allard endorses Romney, conservatives weep

The Political Pale Horse asks, "What the hell?"


**Update--Giuliani fundraiser cancelled due to VA Tech massacre

Meanwhile, former NY Mayor Rudy Giuliani is in town tonight to raise cash . . . but has also appeared to make a comment that marginalizes social conservatives in the GOP:
“Our party is going to grow, and we are going to win in 2008 if we are a party characterized by what we’re for, not if we’re a party that’s known for what we’re against,” the former New York mayor said at a midday campaign stop.

Republicans can win, he said, if they nominate a candidate committed to the fight against terrorism and high taxes, rather than a pure social conservative.

“Our party has to get beyond issues like that,” Giuliani said, a reference to abortion rights, which he supports.
Social conservatives prepared to make allowances for a moderate candidate like Giuliani can accept compromises, or are at the very least willing to entertain a candidate that will at least take them seriously. Ostracizing them with flippant comments dismissing the importance of the issues social conservatives hold dear will do nothing to endear him to skeptical GOP voters hesitant to countenance a socially liberal Presidential candidate.

Labels: , , , , ,

|