Where's Ward Churchillpalooza Week 3: Week 2 Recap, Will He Finally Take The Stand?
"Simply made-up, simply false . . . He just cheated"--University of Colorado sociology professor Michael Radelet, investigative committee member, on one of Ward Churchill's many faulty historical claims
Week 1 Recap--Churchill is expected to take the stand today, barring any more delays or snafus
March 16--Churchill's 9/11 essay "cruel and gratuitous", more here from the Daily Camera blog
March 17--Michael Yellow Bird on inventions in "oral history"; academic debates surrounding Churchill's questionable claims should "remain in the Academy and not in the courts"
March 18--MYB continued . . . "They don't invent facts, they invent the possibility that these things happen":
For the final question CU attorney Patrick O'Rourke asked indigenous studies professor Michael Yellow Bird during his re-cross Wednesday morning, he pulled up a transcript of previous testimony the professor had given to CU's Privilege & Tenure Committee and asked him if he had made the statement that "fabricated, made-up accounts promote the truth."Lynne Stewart, yes that Lynne Stewart, will be defending Churchill this week.
With a slight pause, Yellow Bird said yes.
"No further questions," O'Rourke said, closing his binder and taking a seat.
CU investigative committee prof: Not "part of a right-wing attempt to get professor Churchill," problems with sourcing
March 19--technical snafu's deplete Churchill's crowd of supporters; CU's lead attorney goes on the offensive
March 20--Why the Churchill case matters from Vince Carroll of the Post; Churchill "hiding behind" oral tradition
March 23--Churchill lawyer claims that the powers that be at CU "disrespect Native people"; "He just cheated":
University of Colorado sociology professor Michael Radelet, who served on the investigative committee looking into allegations of academic misconduct by Ward Churchill, said his initial concern was that his colleague was being "railroaded" by people who wanted to see him punished for writing a controversial essay.Drunkablog has Radelet's assertions that, by Churchill's standards, just about anyone in Boulder in 1996 could be a suspect in the JonBenet Ramsey murder.
Radelet said he even signed on to a statement drawn up by his colleagues calling for Churchill's academic freedom and First Amendment rights to be protected by the university during the days after the 9/11 essay came to light.
"I am not and was not a person they would pick if they wanted someone to frame, railroad or even convict Ward Churchill of research misconduct," Radelet told the jury.
He testified that the committee, sensitive to the concept of academic freedom, "bent over backwards" to give Churchill the benefit of the doubt.
Radelet, who looked into allegations that Churchill had falsified information through his contention that there was "pretty strong circumstantial evidence" that Captain John Smith purposely introduced smallpox to the Wampanoag Indians in Massachusetts, said the claim was "simply made-up, simply false."
"He just cheated," he told the jury.
Much more from the aforementioned Drunkablog, who has braved the trial's tedium and icy glares from the Chutchites for two weeks already, and PirateBallerina, who continues to serve up links galore to Churchilliana.
The Daily Camera's blog/story archives are here, and the Race to the Bottom blog offering legal insights into the trial continues to chronicle the Churchill legal saga.